oh boy oh boy...
I was watching the news this afternoon... and yeah..........
Channel 10 outta Syracuse. they cover the Ny news it's pretty neat .. i enjoy it.
But anyway, A middle aged man was found in Nyc with a NEW STRAIN of HIV.. this is a more severe strain and is very dangerous,
Unlike the one we are all most commonly familiar with which takes a few Years to develope, this new strain developes in only 2 to 3 months!
All i ask is that you be safe , choose your partners wisely and get tested.
(sry i'm done feeling all responsible now)
Thanks for your time
Caylin
I was watching the news this afternoon... and yeah..........
Channel 10 outta Syracuse. they cover the Ny news it's pretty neat .. i enjoy it.
But anyway, A middle aged man was found in Nyc with a NEW STRAIN of HIV.. this is a more severe strain and is very dangerous,
Unlike the one we are all most commonly familiar with which takes a few Years to develope, this new strain developes in only 2 to 3 months!
All i ask is that you be safe , choose your partners wisely and get tested.
(sry i'm done feeling all responsible now)
Thanks for your time
Caylin
posted by:
|
|
Unsubscribed |
-
Unsu...
Re: REAL WORLD ISSUES!
Tue, February 15, 2005 - 10:48 AMI like the picture of you on the toilet. Thats hot. Have you ever engaged in oral sex while sitting on the toilet or whilst a partner was defacating? -
-
-
Re: REAL WORLD ISSUES!
Tue, February 15, 2005 - 2:38 PMModerator? This is a thread that badly needs deleting. -
-
Unsu...
Re: REAL WORLD ISSUES!
Tue, February 15, 2005 - 3:37 PMbut what about the existential ramifications of all of this? are we un-free here to discuss our own personal meaning? HIV and defecation/oral sex seem like fine existential topics to me. -
-
Unsu...
Re: REAL WORLD ISSUES!
Wed, February 16, 2005 - 8:39 PMI'm with Ewan (in thought), though the potty picture makes me a bit nervous . . .
Aren't there many "existential challenges" cleverly embedded in Caylin's message?
"All i ask is that you be safe." Is she asking "is it possible to *be* safe, or is safety the result of an action, not something I *am*?
"choose your partners wisely." Is she challenging us on the question of free will? *Can* we really choose? If so, can we choose *wisely*? And is there such a thing as a "partner" for a self?
"and get tested." Pragmatism always seems to sneak in at the end after the espresso is all gone and the conversation has died. What an apt challenge for us all to verify our presence/existence.
I hope I'm not reading too much into this thread . . . -
-
Unsu...
Re: REAL WORLD ISSUES!
Thu, February 17, 2005 - 1:04 PMwow... brain...................shit. -
-
Unsu...
Re: REAL WORLD ISSUES!
Thu, February 17, 2005 - 7:13 PMbrainshit (always wipe front to back)
that explains the toilet metaphor -
-
Re: REAL WORLD ISSUES!
Fri, February 18, 2005 - 10:56 AMJust when I thought we'd hit rock bottom .... -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.Unsu...
Climbing further downward
Fri, February 18, 2005 - 5:15 PMOkay, how about this:
One of the dilemmas with pop-culture Existentialism is that it turns into so much coffee table clatter (usually in the U.S.) and feels more like a pose than a purpose. Yet the entire thrust of the method is *being through action* as the means whereby I come to know myself. Hegel and much of what preceded the movement got lost in esoterica that had no real-world relevance. Kierkegaard's point that philosophers build elegant castles while living in a hut next door pertains here.
The immediacy of "I've got AIDS" or "I'm about to hit that truck" jolts us from a complacency that isn't usually startled. Or our kid dies, or our spouse leaves, or a number of unexpected events occur. Things cease to make sense, get hazy. When Sartre freaks out in Les Mots as he's looking at a tree root and its *being* confuses and frightens him, he's talking about the inability to *explain* existence since the experience of things precedes the understanding of them. Kierkegaard's point pertains again: we understand after the fact but we have to live *forward*. We bump into things. Everything's de trop, in the way. That's what startles us into being.
Walking is a constant falling; we just don't notice it. -
-
Re: Climbing further downward
Fri, February 18, 2005 - 5:23 PMOkay, now we have hit rock bottom. ;)
What you say seems true enough. If the original poster had said anything at all about Existentialism, I would not have thought it was off-topic.
By the way, I think Hegel has a lot of real-world relevancy, and many of his critics were just bitter old anemic shrews (like Schopenhauer). -
-
Unsu...
Re: Climbing further downward
Fri, February 18, 2005 - 6:29 PMAre you calling me anemic?
I agree with you about Hegel and hope I didn't seem to be deriding him. He was just a handy example to note there can often be a disconnect between all this stuff going on in my mind and my real world experience. That dis-integrity seems to be a common thing moderns note and comment on. Now, post-modern, there are many attempts to restore an immediacy to existence that maybe wasn't there in the first place. People pierce themselves, act out in other ways, in an attempt to feel something, anything.
In Lawrence of Arabia (the movie), Lawrence lights a match and puts it out with his fingers (or something like that). And the fellow watching says "What's the trick?" And Lawrence says, "The trick is, not caring."
It's possible we live in a deadened culture, or one so frazzled by incessant external stimuli that it has inured itself by various forms of sedation. The dilemma with subjective philosophies (whether idealism or pseudo-existentialism) in such a culture is to keep from becoming solipsistic (sp?). Agnosticism is a good example: the common view is that it basically means "Who cares?" yet Huxley considered it a significant & passionate stance.
Watered down philosophy. Talk show terminology. Yet one only has to read the Apology to see how serious a consistent philosophical stance can be.
BTW: I was just goofing around and wandering. REAL WORLD TOPIC seems a compelling starting point though.
-
-
-
-
-
-
safety.
Sat, February 19, 2005 - 2:44 AMi always end up saying something that someone doesnt like, so i suppose i will do that again.
OF COURSE the new strain of HIV is existential-related.
doesnt it have something to do w/ existence??
howsabout those choices??
if i remember correctly, & i think i do, if one hones existentialism down the its very boniest bones, it is about how nothihg much matters beyohnd the choices one makes, b/c very little matters anyway, or at least very little major matters that can be easily considered controlled by what has been corrupted into the words "higher power."
to make our own choices of existence would no more dis-include choosing -not- to pass on a potentially horrible strain of a potentially horrible disease any more than it would dis-include going out to get the paper & getting hit by a milk truck.
in some ways it goes back to sartres pre-stalin marxism & how "choices" (to be a communist, then) meant something different than a choice to be a communist now, but it is almost 3am & i am always in the process of having some horrible thing done to me or recovering from it or its aftermath & i dont feel up to discussing that at the moment, although, you betcha, i could.
there is more to existentialism then just parading around on some campus belaboring points of bataille (postpost) et michel leiris or whoever is current now, in terms of what came before & how silly what preceded the current colloquium of thought may actually be --but probably isnt.
there comes a point where discussion must turn into action, oh yes it must, or eles one ends up just where we are now, w/ a monkey controlling all of the western & most of the eastern & many of the places in between of the known world.
& one of that very serious ports of discussion into action comes w/ doing ones best not to spread horrible virusii that kill people in more than unpleasant ways; those of us that know nobody who has succummed might be more than unwilling to get an earful from me, who would be more than happy to provide it.
nonsense about toilets i could live w/o.
trivia does not tingle my dingle, as they once said. especially trivia meant to shock the rather unshockable. live thru life & listening to words just becomes irritating. -
-
Unsu...
Re: safety.
Sat, February 19, 2005 - 10:37 AMtoilets :smiles: ........... not nonsense ........
: goes back to her throne :
>toilets< ^.^ -
-
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: safety.
Tue, February 22, 2005 - 11:14 AMErgo: Are you calling me anemic?
No - I was calling Schopenhauer anemic, although I love him.
Blah blah blah blah choice blah blah freewill blah blah.
The initial post was off-topic. -
-
Unsu...
Re: safety.
Tue, February 22, 2005 - 11:27 AMI need to learn how to put the smiley faces on my questions. Sorry :>
I don't know Schopenhauer much, if you don't mind talking a little more on this (either here or on a separate thread).
Thanks.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: REAL WORLD ISSUES!
Tue, February 22, 2005 - 11:59 AMI think this post is on topic. She's saying....be responsible! -
-
Re: REAL WORLD ISSUES!
Thu, February 24, 2005 - 12:49 PMHow responsible can one be while taking dump will some sucks your cock/clit? -
-
Unsu...
Re: REAL WORLD ISSUES!
Mon, February 28, 2005 - 7:11 AMpretty ..damn.. responsible..
nuff said.
-
-
